Higher immigration does not fully account for recent labor market resilience
The United States has witnessed strong growth and tight labor markets lately. Interestingly establishment survey and household survey, two separate measures of labor market, have diverged significantly. Establishment survey or ‘Headline NFP’ has pointed towards robust growth, while household survey has underperformed. Higher immigration has caught on as a potential explanation for the same.
A CBO report earlier this year made the case that official population estimates from Census have underestimated the recent surge in immigration by around 3.5mn in the last 2 years i.e. 2022 and 2023. This assertion quickly caught on as both a market and Fed consensus, which has led to higher estimates of trend employment and GDP growth and offered an ex-post justification for 2023’s “soft landing” of disinflation amid broader economic resilience.
In our view, there is some evidence of faster immigration, but estimates from the CBO (based on Department of Homeland Security measures) appear to be on the high-end of a reasonable range. Outside of DHS and Census data, potential signs for a surge in immigration are mixed. Balance of payments data on remittances to Mexico and northern triangle countries from the United States support the higher immigration estimates, while housing data appears to be inconsistent with CBO’s narrative. In addition, state level labor data also suggest that there is almost no relationship between the foreign-born population share and the gap between state-level household and establishment survey employment estimates. Alternative labor market measures and industry mix of job gains also offers evidence against a pure labor-supply shock.
Overall, we see some evidence of faster immigration growth, but there are also reasons to question the CBO’s estimates of a rapid rise. Immigration may partly explain the divergence between household and establishment survey employment estimates, however granular labor data lead us to question whether immigration is the full explanation.
For a more in-depth analysis, read our full report.
Senior US Economist
Senior US Economist
US Economist
Chief Economist for Developed Markets
This content has been prepared by Nomura solely for information purposes, and is not an offer to buy or sell or provide (as the case may be) or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell or enter into any agreement with respect to any security, product, service (including but not limited to investment advisory services) or investment. The opinions expressed in the content do not constitute investment advice and independent advice should be sought where appropriate.The content contains general information only and does not take into account the individual objectives, financial situation or needs of a person. All information, opinions and estimates expressed in the content are current as of the date of publication, are subject to change without notice, and may become outdated over time. To the extent that any materials or investment services on or referred to in the content are construed to be regulated activities under the local laws of any jurisdiction and are made available to persons resident in such jurisdiction, they shall only be made available through appropriately licenced Nomura entities in that jurisdiction or otherwise through Nomura entities that are exempt from applicable licensing and regulatory requirements in that jurisdiction. For more information please go to https://www.nomuraholdings.com/policy/terms.html.