Various approaches to carbon pricing have been trialled in financial and capital markets, illustrating major changes in Enterprise Value.
In 1990, Finland introduced the world's first carbon tax. Now, more than 30 years on, "carbon pricing" is once again in the spotlight as a potentially highly effective tool for combating global warming.
In this article, we provide an overview of the mechanism of carbon pricing, the current status of its introduction, and its future interplay with financial and capital markets.
A carbon price adds a defined monetary cost to a specific amount of emitted greenhouse gas. Its ultimate aim is to reduce emissions and promote investment in low-carbon technologies by pricing something which was previously seen as “free”.
In recent years, various approaches to carbon pricing have been trialed, spread across the globe to varying degrees of success so far.
However, there needs to be a significant increase in the development and adoption of carbon pricing schemes for the world to collectively achieve the “below 2°C” target set out in the Paris Agreement.
Carbon pricing works by setting a uniform price for greenhouse gas emissions and is a measure to combine both the actual costs with the non-economic costs of their impact. Carbon pricing also has the added advantage of being transparent.
Carbon pricing can be broadly divided into (1) government carbon pricing and (2) private companies’ voluntary carbon pricing (See Figure 1).
Government carbon pricing seeks to induce businesses to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions by providing economic incentives to do so. Carbon pricing as an economic method is classified into:
According to a World Bank study, as of April 2020, 46 countries had adopted carbon pricing, with their collective emissions accounting for approximately 22% of global greenhouse gas emissions.
The adoption of carbon pricing has accelerated over the past decade following the 2011 launch of the Partnership for Market Readiness program by the World Bank. Now superseded by the Partnership for Market Implementation, launched last year, the objective of the partnership is to assist countries to design, pilot, and implement explicit carbon pricing instruments aligned with domestic development priorities. The 10-year program aims to introduce a strong price signal on carbon emissions through programs and policies globally.
As a result of schemes like this, the number of countries and regions that have introduced pricing policies is rising. See Figure 3 below for a global timeline of carbon pricing adoption so far.
The IMF and International Energy Agency have said that in many cases, the projected rate of reduction in carbon dioxide emissions would not be sufficient to meet the Paris Agreement targets unless a higher tax rate was imposed.
In recent years, governments around the world have committed to achieving “net-zero” in the coming decades, with Japan, China, South Korea, and the EU (under its Green New Deal) all seeking to reach net zero at the latest by 2060. Under a new administration, the United States has also recently re-joined the Paris Treaty. Carbon pricing is likely to play an instrumental role in helping these countries reach their greenhouse gas emissions targets.
Financial market participants recognize that carbon pricing is set to have a wide range of both direct and indirect impacts on corporate finance. For example, a direct impact could be regulatory costs such as tax, while an indirect impact could be higher supply chain costs (See Figure 4).
We see three key factors for consideration by financial and capital markets participants:
(1) the presence of the ESG (Environment, Society and Governance) as an evaluation axis;
(2) enhancing information disclosure by companies; and
(3) developing new financial products.
Carbon pricing is set to play a leading role in how the global economy responds to tackling climate change. The fundamental shift in the emphasis that companies, investors, and society place on what was once seen as a “free” commodity will have far-reaching consequences for capital and financial markets. This is a changing landscape and one set to grow incrementally in importance in the near future. Understanding the potential ramifications will be increasingly important. Figure 5 above shows the changes countries need to make to meet the Paris agreement.
Head of Nomura Research Center of Sustainability, NICMR
This content has been prepared by Nomura solely for information purposes, and is not an offer to buy or sell or provide (as the case may be) or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell or enter into any agreement with respect to any security, product, service (including but not limited to investment advisory services) or investment. The opinions expressed in the content do not constitute investment advice and independent advice should be sought where appropriate.The content contains general information only and does not take into account the individual objectives, financial situation or needs of a person. All information, opinions and estimates expressed in the content are current as of the date of publication, are subject to change without notice, and may become outdated over time. To the extent that any materials or investment services on or referred to in the content are construed to be regulated activities under the local laws of any jurisdiction and are made available to persons resident in such jurisdiction, they shall only be made available through appropriately licenced Nomura entities in that jurisdiction or otherwise through Nomura entities that are exempt from applicable licensing and regulatory requirements in that jurisdiction. For more information please go to https://www.nomuraholdings.com/policy/terms.html.